Could you please elaborate on the comparison between Optimism and Arbitrum in terms of gas efficiency? Which one offers better scalability and lower transaction costs? How do they differ in terms of network congestion and throughput? Additionally, which platform is more suitable for different types of decentralized applications? Could you provide some insights into their respective advantages and disadvantages? Finally, based on your expertise, which gas do you recommend for crypto enthusiasts seeking to minimize fees and maximize performance?
6 answers
Dario
Mon Jun 17 2024
However, Optimism chooses to deviate from this norm and leverage ETH for transaction fees.
CoinMasterMind
Mon Jun 17 2024
Unlike Arbitrum, Optimism opts for a unique approach in transaction fee management.
Stefano
Mon Jun 17 2024
Arbitrum, as a blockchain network, processes its fees in its native token, a standard practice in the cryptocurrency sphere.
Martino
Sun Jun 16 2024
This decision is strategic, as it aligns Optimism with the larger Ethereum ecosystem, enhancing interoperability.
Alessandra
Sun Jun 16 2024
ETH, being a widely recognized and established cryptocurrency, provides a stable and liquid medium for transaction fees.